logo

Archive for March, 2010

Niqab: Gender equity or social exclusion?

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Christine Overall, Queen’s University
Guest Contributor

Naïma Atef Amed has twice been forced out of government-funded French language classes for new immigrants in Montreal. The reason is that she wears a niqab, a face veil chosen by some Muslim women. As a philosopher, I’m interested in whether the reasons used to defend this action are justified.

Officials first said that wearing the niqab interferes with education. “Pedagogical principles” and “pedagogical objectives” require that the face be exposed. This is an odd claim. Amed’s niqab would not prevent others in the class from learning, unless language learning specifically requires that others read her lips. Even so, this student is only one of many; it can’t be all that important for others to hear her speak.

But perhaps her niqab affects her own education. Maybe the real issue is that the teacher can’t see her mouth and know if she is forming the words correctly. Yet students often do things that may (or may not) compromise their capacity to learn, such as skipping classes or failing to study. Instructors may advise them not to do it, but they don’t usually bar the students from the classroom. After all, this woman is an adult; she can make her own choices about her education – and suffer the consequences if she makes bad ones.

So, there aren’t solid pedagogical reasons to bar a niqab wearer.

Premier Jean Charest offered a different claim: People who expect to receive public services must show their face. (more…)

Engaged Scholarship – Live from the Fedcan General Assembly Meetings

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Live from the Annual Meeting of the General Assembly

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

The 5 Ls of Mentoring

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Minister Faust
Guest Contributor

For this post, we’re offering it in audio form – simply click on the link below and listen! Or, if you’d prefer to read, a shortened transcript follows.

Click here to listen to the full podcast.

I’ve worked with children and youth for more than 20 years. In that time I’ve been a child care worker, a youth activist, a junior high and high school teacher, a youth leadership coach, and a director of youth community theatre. I’ve made plenty of mistakes in that time, but I’m also happy to have learned a few things, things I’d like to share with you now.

My wife, who was a social worker for ten years and is now a psychologist, was very wise to remind me that when it comes to mentorship, nothing matters more than a strong personal bond between mentor and student. Over years in my role as a broadcaster, I’ve asked numerous guests, from famous actors and writers to political activists, “Who was your favourite teacher and why?” regardless of how you define “teacher.” I’ve received many touching and hilarious responses, but a couple of things stand out: nobody ever says, “This person was my favourite because she was the smartest,” or “He was my favourite because he was an expert.” My guests almost always stressed that their favourite teachers made them feel special, helped them to realise they had ability they didn’t know they had, believed in them, and guided them to become more personally able to reach their goals.

In the archetypes of myth that show up in popular culture, those types of mentors are beloved characters. Given my age and generation, the two who stand out most are Ben Kenobi from Star Wars and Mr. Miyagi from The Karate Kid. And those examples force us to see something else about the personal bond. Ben guides Luke, and Mr. Miyagi guides Daniel. Both youth men are in pain, missing their fathers, and yearning not just for connection to something eternal (the Force or the martial arts), but for what an adult can give them: time, patience, affection, loyalty, sacrifice, and wonder. Yet each mentor, until he commits to his student, is living is isolation, is incomplete, is in need of someone with whom to share, is yearning for the chance to be loyal, affectionate and giving.

So that means that if your life is too full–if your career, your family, your hobbies or other pursuits take all or nearly all of your time, now is not the time to be a mentor, unless you’re able to bring your student into your archetypal garden to tend to the flowers, roots and trees with you. If you can’t, maybe it’s just that you can’t right now. In the meantime, you can keep reading up on mentorship so that when the time is right, you’ll be more ready.

So all of what I have to tell you today is based on my wife’s advice: the personal connection is the key. (more…)

Mentoring and equity: Women and geography

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

Bonnie Kaserman, University of British Columbia
Guest Contributor

Once a month I head out from my apartment in the evening, directions to someone’s home usually scrawled on a piece of scrap paper. Each month, a group of women geographers, composed of graduate students, researchers, postdoctoral fellows and faculty, gather in someone’s living room. I am one of these women. We meet in order to discuss our gendered experiences in the discipline, to learn from one another, and to enhance our understanding of academic culture so that we might make positive changes in the academy.  We also laugh.  A lot.

Almost a decade ago, women from the Geography departments of both the University of British Columbia and Simon Fraser University began these strategic meetings. Today, the group continues to be a vibrant space of mentoring, and our group is one of several throughout Canada and the United States. These groups have formed in response to gendered departmental experiences and to inequities documented within the discipline and the academy. Groups are autonomous and differ in organizational structures, membership and activities, but we share a common goal of promoting the participation of women in Geography.  As such, we share the moniker Supporting Women in Geography (SWIG).

I’ve participated in SWIG groups since I was an undergraduate Geography major. I am now completing my PhD in the discipline, and mentoring within the SWIG community remains one of the highlights of my academic life.  In SWIG we frame mentoring as feminist praxis, that is, to work with women, people of color, and other groups marginalized from and within the academy in order to negotiate the academic system and to make change within the academy.

Participating in SWIG has, for me, brought to the fore two questions regarding equity: How do we make sustainable change? How do we make sustainable the process of making change? (more…)

Much ado about mentoring

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Malinda Smith, VP Equity

Let’s be audacious and say it: Some of the most innovative – socially innovative – developments in human history have occurred in the social sciences and humanities. I think mentoring is one of them: Mentoring is a social innovation, whose improbable beginnings can be traced to, of all things, a poem. The modern idea of mentoring often is traced back to the figure Mentor who appeared in Homer’s epic poem, Odyssey, over 3,000 years ago.

Telemachus (son of King Ulysses) the Mentor.

Some form of mentoring currently is practiced by such diverse organizations as EqualVoice, Big Brothers and Big Sisters, and the Mentoring Partnership. There is the Order of Canada Mentorship Program, which partners young people with Order of Canada recipients. As well, on university and college campuses across the country there are various forms of peer, faculty-student and faculty-faculty mentoring initiatives. In fact, across many academic institutions mentoring increasingly is seen as a core mission. However, despite the proliferation of formal and informal mentoring programs and the burgeoning literature on the topic, it is debatable whether we have a deep understanding of the practice.

And so, the Federation’s General Assembly meeting this Saturday will feature a panel, “Much ado about Mentoring.” The title pays due respect to Shakespearean comedy, which weaves and teases out the complex layers of meaning of social phenomena. The play especially recognizes that human beings have a remarkable ability to engage in self-deception, that we can play games, sometimes with the very best intentions, to produce everything from love matches to trying to get people to correct the error of their ways. There is much that can be said about this, but the one question it leads me to consider is the value of programs designed to effect good mentoring versus, for example, the accidental mentor, someone who unexpectedly becomes an inspiring and transformative figure. (more…)

Canadian Economics Association responds to SSHRC’s program changes

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

James Brander, President, and Michael Veall, Vice-President
On behalf of the Executive Council of the Canadian Economics Association

Guest Contributors

We have reviewed the proposed changes described in the “Briefing on SSHRC’s Renewed Program Architecture” of March 2010. We applaud the SSHRC for seeking to assess and improve its procedures and we recognize that many of the proposed changes will be helpful to the research process. However, we would like to express our concern about two proposed changes.

1.  Research Record. Section V on “Research Grants” indicates an intention to reduce the weight placed on the “capability” of the applicant to 20%. The other 80% would be for the proposal itself, dividing into 40% for the “challenge” and 40% for “feasibility.” Compared to the current situation, this change represents a dramatic reduction in the weight placed on the applicant’s research record, which is currently 60%. With a weight of only 20% this criterion would be little more than a marginal consideration.

De-emphasizing the track record of applicants would reward the ability to write grants (sometimes called “grantsmanship”) at the expense of the proven ability to do research. Writing attractive proposals and actually doing research are sufficiently different activities that this is a major problem. It is, for example, increasingly the case that universities and even individuals are turning to professional grant writers for help. The proposed changes might, in effect, cause adjudications to be based more on the ability of professional grant writers than on likely research outcomes.

This problem is worsened by the fact that there is little follow-up regarding what is proposed in successful applications. It is easy to make broad claims and then produce relatively little research. Rarely, if ever, is grant money taken back if the research output falls short of what is promised. (more…)

SSHRC Program Architecture Renewal – Share your thoughts

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Noreen Golfman, President

The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council recently released the latest draft of their proposed Program Architecture Renewal. You can find a primer on the Program Architecture Renewal on the Federation’s website, or read about the changes in full on SSHRC’s website. SSHRC is currently welcoming feedback about the proposed changes on their website.

Post your comments on the Federation blog

The Federation is inviting members of the social sciences and humanities community to share their thoughts and submit entries for posting on this blog.

Enter your comments below, or contact Karen Diepeveen if you would like to submit a blog post on the proposed changes to SSHRC’s program architecture.  Use this as a forum for discussion, sharing this conversation and documents with your community.

International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination 2010: Racism, anti-racism and the academy

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Frances Henry, York University
Guest Contributor

Anti-racist scholars across the country are raising critical issues about the dynamics of racial inequity in the Canadian academy. An increasing literature written largely by racialized and Indigenous scholars questions the persistence of hegemonic whiteness of the university by asking questions such as: Who is represented in the academy? Whose voice is heard and who is ignored?  Whose knowledge counts and whose knowledge is discounted?

More and more racialized and Indigenous faculty are prepared to critique and change the hegemony of whiteness that is embedded in everyday interactions in classrooms and in the institutionalized spaces where power is exercised. In critically examining these and many other questions, it becomes clear that the status of Indigenous and racialized faculty in the academy today is not equal to that of their White colleagues. The literature clearly points to a remarkable commonality among them: in the experiences they have had, the barriers they have encountered, the pain and frustration they have endured and the sense of isolation, marginality, and exclusion from the institutional whiteness they have felt.

Critical race theories as applied to the university structure and its ‘culture of whiteness’ have been particularly useful in demonstrating the subtlety and elusiveness of  university practices  that help to create and maintain systems of inequity. They have also been useful in positing an alternative – how social justice and educational equity in our universities and Canadian society can be attained.

Commonly articulated discourses in the academy are strongly influenced by traditional liberal theories and assumptions as they relate to issues of race, racism and other forms of oppression. (more…)

Congratulations to Holberg Prize Winner

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Canadian humanities researchers have yet again proven their ability to compete internationally, with the Holberg International Memorial Prize being awarded to a Canadian for the second year in a row.  Natalie Zemon Davis from the University of Toronto has won the prestigious $785,000 prize, a portion of which she plans to donate to research libraries, according to the Globe and Mail.

When asked to comment on the prize, Noreen Golfman, president of the Federation stated, “Often it takes validation from outside – whether it’s Hollywood or Norway – before we’re allowed to celebrate our own. It’s a huge deal and a great, great honour in an area that people seem to think of as increasingly marginal.”

This is truly an example of the excellence and innovation inherent in our community.

You can read the full story from the Globe and Mail online here and the Globe and Mail’s editorial is available here. You can also get the press release from Holberg online here.