logo

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Trans Rights in Mexico and Canada: The Geopolitics of Privilege

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

Oralia Gómez-Ramírez, University of British Columbia
Guest Contributor

 

This entry is part of the CFHSS’s VP Equity Issues series on issues related to LGBTQI2-S (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, questioning, intersex and Two-Spirited) peoples.

 

When I asked trans activists Angie Rueda Castillo and Irina Layevska what this blog entry should be about, the two of them encouraged me to account for what is happening in the struggle for trans people’s rights in Mexico, and how this may contrast and compare to the state of affairs in Canada.

 

In Mexico City, a local law was approved in 2008 allowing trans peoples to change their name and sex on birth certificates and other official documents. Despite its narrow provincial jurisdiction and current limited accessibility and affordability, this legal change has been viewed positively by members of the trans communities. The measure allows trans peoples to obtain birth certificates without marginal annotations indicating the sex and name legally assigned to them at birth, and they are not required to undergo a genital surgery to obtain their identification documents. Acutely aware of the status of trans-related legislations in other parts of the world, activists in Mexico have praised the law not only for addressing some of the issues of social stigma, but also for opening up space to live and think about the wide array of trans experiences without the imposition of a medicalized frame.

 

In the field of critical intersectional studies of gender and sexuality, there is a general willingness to be self-critical and open to new ideas and transformation. At the same time, coming from and having carried out my doctoral fieldwork in one location in the global South, specifically in Mexico City, I continue to notice the ways in which many concepts, categories, discourses, policies, strategies, and the like emerge in the global North, become influential and, subsequently, are circulated and taken up in the global South as desirable models of sensible, good or best practices. Needless to say, those flows of ideas are not unidirectional or unequivocal although it is an intricate task to trace the genealogy of an idea or a concept and how it travels worldwide. Yet, it would be really hard to be oblivious to the fact that such circulations occur against a backdrop of uneven and hierarchical global geopolitical configurations in which nation-states’ wealth and power differentials matter. (more…)

News from the social sciences and humanities

Thursday, December 22nd, 2011

Milena Stanoeva
Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences

On December 8, Lou Hammond Ketilson, from the University of Saskatchewan, presented a Big Thinking lecture on the economic impact of credit unions. If you missed Professor Hammond Ketilson’s lecture, it’s now available on video. Professor Hammond Ketilson was also interviewed by The Western Producer.

A report commissioned by the New College of Humanities, a British for-profit college opening next year, indicates that sixty percent of UK leaders in fields such as business and politics have degrees in the humanities, social sciences or arts. The report challenges perceptions that there are few career opportunities for students graduating with degrees in the humanities and social sciences.

AUCC profiled an innovative program for undergraduates at Queen’s University–Inquiry@Queen’s. The program is open to all majors and it offers undergraduate students the opportunity to present their research to their peers at the annual Undergraduate Research Conference. This program exposes undergraduate students to research in different disciplines, teaches them to conduct their own research and helps them familiarize themselves with the processes involved in presenting research at academic conferences.

Researchers at York University’s Schulich School of Business have found a “Santa Syndrome” among holiday shoppers. The researchers explained that shoppers who believe in a just world, one where well-behaved children get good presents and naughty children get lumps of coal, are more likely to deal with doubts about the gifts they’ve bought by putting more trust in salespeople.

CFHSS wishes happy holidays to all our readers! We will be back with blog posts in the new year.

CFHSS congratulates members of its board on their new appointments

Friday, December 9th, 2011

Here at CFHSS we are very proud of the excellence and expertise among our Board of Directors. The members of our board show tremendous leadership at their institutions, and that translates into strong leadership of CFHSS as well.

We are, therefore, pleased to congratulate CFHSS president Graham Carr on being named the Interim Vice-President of Research and Graduate Studies at Concordia University. For more information on the announcement you can read the Concordia release here.

Graham’s new position follows the recent appointment of Karen Grant, our Vice-President Research Policy, to the post of Provost and Vice-President, Academic and Research at Mount Allison University, and the appointment of Noreen Golfman, our Past-President, to a position on the Board of Directors of the Canadian Association of Graduate Studies.

Our board members’ diversity of expertise certainly makes for rich discussion around the board table. This is also the kind of excellence CFHSS is seeing among the new applicants to the executive. Many have displayed impressive credentials and CVs and are sure to bring even more wisdom and enthusiasm to our organization and the humanities and social sciences sector.

Developing Intersectional Solidarities: A Plea for Queer Intersectionality

Tuesday, October 18th, 2011

Sirma Bilge, Université de Montréal
Guest Contributor

This entry is part of the CFHSS’s VP Equity Issues series on issues related to LGBTQI2-S (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, questioning, intersex and Two-Spirited) peoples.

Contemporary progressive politics of protest frequently face a problem of legitimacy, authority and representation. Since at least the late 1970s and throughout the 1980s, anti-racist, anti-colonial feminists and queer activists have taken issue with the politics of representation and the problem of speaking for/about others. Scholars like Gayatri Chakraborty Spivak and Linda Alcoff have urged us to acknowledge that systemic disparities in social location between those who speak and those who are spoken for have significant effects on the content of what is said.

Today, the elisions and exclusions that most contemporary progressive movements prompt in their claims making receive almost immediate critique. Innovative new information and communications technological platforms enable both the viral explosion of these movements as well as their (internal) critiques from those who are marginalized, excluded, misrepresented, tokenized or erased in political struggles.

Consider the following examples of the SlutWalk, the It Gets Better Project, and Occupy Wall Street. Although there is growing  sympathy for these movements, in all three cases voices have been raised to deplore how  well-intentioned movements inadvertently (re)produce oppression along one or several axes of power – even while attempting to combat it along other axes. In their attempts to contest domination and redress injustice, all three of these movements have been criticized for their failure to take into account the multiple and co-constitutive makeup of power/privilege complex, with its interlocking structural and ideological underpinnings. (more…)

Integrating the humanities and social sciences

Friday, October 14th, 2011

Kel Morin-Parson
Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences

We are all aware of the problem of “silos”—that is, the tendency, in Western thought and culture in particular, to separate and isolate everything: body from mind, work from play, and, in the case of the academy, disciplines from one another. We know, at some level, that integration has tremendous benefits, but it can be surprisingly hard to put into practice.

This week, Richard Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation, writes an interesting article in The Chronicle of Higher Education about higher-ed policy and the people who might most fruitfully be invited to the table when it is discussed. In particular, he reflects upon the complexity around how space is allocated at universities and to whom, arguing that philosophers would be well-equipped partners in policy-making of this kind. More of this sort of attempted integration of the humanities and social sciences into each other, and into the active work of policy, can surely be nothing but beneficial.

Coming Out: Re-engaging the Radical

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

Elise Chenier, Simon Fraser University

Guest Contributor

This entry is part of the CFHSS’s VP Equity Issues series on issues related to LGBTQI2-S (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, questioning, intersex and Two-Spirited) peoples.

Today (October 11th) is National Coming Out Day. First celebrated in 1988 to mark the one-year anniversary of the March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights, National Coming Out Day has grown into a major human rights campaign for lesbian, gay, and lately, transgender equality. The nation referred to is the United States of America, but like so much of Canadian culture and politics, National Coming Out Day has been taken up by LGBTIQ2 (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer and Two-Spirited) activists in Canada as well.

Do we really need a National Coming Out Day? Isn’t gay “so over,” as a young adult character in Toronto queer playwright Brad Fraser’s 2011 True Love Lies declares? For many of us who came out ten or more years ago, the present seems like a pretty friendly place to live, particularly here in Canada where citizens and residents are protected from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and where similar protection against discrimination based on gender identity may be brought into law in the imaginable future. Gay may be “so over,” but the radical anti-shame vision advanced by early gay liberationists still has much to offer us, especially in these political times. (more…)

News from the Social Sciences and Humanities

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

Milena Stanoeva
Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences

Industry Minister Christian Paradis reintroduced the copyright reform bill. Bill C-11 expands the list of uses that fall under fair dealing, although it also contains an anti-circumvention provision against digital locks, limiting how consumers can use digital media, like DVDs. Read CFHSS’s response to Bill C-32, the 2010 copyright reform act, here.

In a recent column in its publication, Perspectives, The American Historical Association urged history departments to encourage PhD students to pursue a career outside of the academe. They argue that history PhD students outnumber tenure-track openings, so history departments must change their view of non-academic careers as “alternative.” CFHSS’s pre-budget submission also urged for greater job opportunities for social sciences and humanities students.

Academic research can be difficult to translate accurately in mainstream media. Times Higher Education reports on an Australian website, theconversation.edu.au, where academics and seasoned journalists collaborate to create content on a variety of topics.

Stephen Saideman makes the case for the value of university research in the Globe and Mail.  He argues that teaching and research are not competing interests, but rather two parts of a whole.

Congratulations to Dr. Chad Gaffield, who was reappointed president of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Will history repeat itself? For the sake of food security, let’s hope not

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

Alison Hebbs, Director, Policy and Communications
Canadian Federation for Humanities and Social sciences

Drawing from history, economics and political science and speaking with an infectious style, Dr Evan Fraser, Canada Research Chair in Global Human Security at the University of Guelph captivated audiences all over Ottawa with his assessment of the current global food crisis. And, by all over Ottawa, we mean just that. In less than 24 hours, Dr Fraser gave generously of his time and expertise to students and the general public at the Lieutenant’s Pump, to officials, senior civil servants and heads of NGOs and NPOs on Parliament Hill on Wednesday morning (early) and to City of Ottawa representatives also on Wednesday morning (later).

And just what was the impression he left on these audiences?

That history—the dust bowl era, previous droughts and famines—reveals a great deal and provides ample evidence to help inform our current policy setting when it comes to food security. He explained four different types of solutions that are oft debated and implemented when interventions are needed, described loosely as technocratic, bureaucratic, humanitarian and communitarian (the last one referring for local food movements and the like). While it is tempting to veer ideologically and practically toward one of these camps, he urges us to keep the lines of communication open between those who may be more supportive of one or the other of these—a solution will necessitate elements of all.

We have to agree and what better ambassador could such an effort have than Dr Fraser, who engaged, inspired and educated us during his brief but highly productive stay in the Nation’s capital.

Listen to the podcast of the Parliament Hill breakfast.

Wangari Maathai – living the life of an engaged scholar (1940-2011)

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

Jean-Marc Mangin, Executive Director, CFHSS

I first met Dr. Maathai face to face in September 2009 for a working breakfast in New York. Later that day, she was scheduled to address the UN General Assembly summit on climate change as the lone voice from civil society. The problem was that her speech (developed with the help of several umbrella NGOs and some UN officials) was an incoherent mess that attempted to please everyone. She knew it and I knew it and this last minute breakfast was our only chance to fix it. Nonetheless, she was smiling and laughing (and, unknown to me, already fighting her cancer). In the course of a couple of hours of mad but fun re-drafting, her unique voice re-emerged in the speech. These were the only sections that received spontaneous applause later that day. I worked again with Dr. Maathai when she attended the Copenhagen climate conference – she brought rare hope and can-do optimism to an international conference laden with mistrust and missed historical opportunities.

Dr. Maathai, the first African woman to earn a PhD in Eastern Africa, was deeply engaged in tackling the challenges of her society. For her, there were no artificial barriers between academia and community, between compassion, action and scholarly reflection. She leaves an example for all of us. It was a privilege to briefly cross her path.

The 2011 Vanier scholarships highlight excellence in Canadian research and graduate studies

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011

Canadian Federation for the humanities and social sciences

As the prestigious Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship Program enters its third year, we are pleased to congratulate the latest round of Vanier scholars.

The Vanier Scholarship Program provides funding to exceptional graduate students from Canada and around the world who choose to pursue doctoral studies in Canada. It provides valuable support to Canada’s research community, highlighting outstanding contributions to our understanding of complex global issues and bolstering Canada’s reputation as a world-class education centre for graduate students and researchers.

“On this exceptional roster of emerging scholars are some of the best and brightest from around the world” said Graham Carr, President of the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences. “Supporting this next cohort of researchers is critical to ensuring that we have the talent to foster creativity, deepen knowledge, create new jobs and enhance Canadians’ overall well-being.”

This year’s social sciences and humanities scholarships have been awarded to researchers at the top of their fields. Their research examines issues of importance to Canadians and provides valuable insight for policy-makers. Christine Proulx, a doctoral candidate at McGill University’s Department of Sociology, is studying the ways in which caretakers’ dual responsibilities for children under 25 and aging relatives affect their personal and professional lives through factors such as hours worked, divorce rates and re-partnering. Jodie Whelan, a doctoral candidate at the Ivey School of Business at the University of Western Ontario, is studying the emotions triggered in consumers when they engage in consumer behaviour and how these emotions affect our decision-making.

For more information on the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship Program and this year’s winners, visit the program webpage

Read the Federation’s official press release on the 2011 Vanier Scholarship recipients here.